This week, I've been thinking a lot about how - or, more importantly, where - batteries get built. In theory, the answer should be "wherever the market pays best." In practice, it's often "wherever the statehouse says so." ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­    ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  
View in browser
In theory batteries get built where the market pays best. In practice, it's where the statehouse says so - here's the US battery map, redrawn.
Sign up to get 3 free research reports every month →
Modo Energy Weekly Dispatch

How the US battery energy storage map is being redrawn

 
US Power Markets Newsletter
Neil Weaver
By Neil Weaver  LinkedIn →
Thursday, July 23, 2026 · 6 min read

This week, I've been thinking a lot about how - or, more importantly, where - batteries get built. In theory, the answer should be "wherever the market pays best." In practice, it's often "wherever the statehouse says so."

In PJM, four states are doing nearly all the heavy lifting.

Map of PJM states shaded by storage support: Virginia utility-mandated, New Jersey/Maryland/Illinois competitive procurement, Pennsylvania/Delaware under consideration, the rest no mandate. A copper line marks the PJM footprint.
Source: Modo Energy

New Jersey, Maryland, and Illinois each run a competitive procurement - albeit through three entirely different mechanisms - and Virginia goes further still, with a mandate for up to 21 GW of batteries by 2045.

Horizontal bar chart of PJM state storage targets: Virginia up to 21 GW by 2045, Illinois 3 GW by 2030, Maryland 3 GW by 2034, New Jersey 2 GW by 2030.
Source: Modo Energy

But each state's push for more batteries comes with a catch.

New Jersey: A fixed payment stacked on top of the market, so you keep every dollar of energy, capacity, and ancillary upside. However, it's availability-linked - run below 90% of hours in a year and the incentive gets docked.

Maryland: A hedge on PJM's most volatile revenue - your capacity income is swapped for a fixed credit. It steadies the wildest part of the stack, but you hand away the upside on it too.

Illinois: The longest security on the board, 20 years, settled against a modelled reference price - and you keep anything you earn above it. But you're exposed to how you perform against that benchmark, not your actual revenue (plus, just 588 of the 1,038 MW even sits inside PJM's borders).

Virginia: Far and away the most ambitious target, but delivered through the utilities, not an open auction. Most of it is Dominion's to build and rate-base - not an open field to bid into.

Read the full analysis
The four states supporting BESS in PJM
Aaron Orelowitz · 7 min read  →

But a payment is only any use if you can actually plug in.

And in PJM, the connection has been the hard part - queued projects in the first reformed interconnection cycle waited nearly two years, and paid $206/kW in network upgrades along the way.

There's a way around it. A distribution-connected battery of 20 MW or less can skip PJM's transmission queue altogether - connecting through the local utility and taking a Wholesale Market Participation Agreement (a WMPA) to reach the wholesale market.

Time to an interconnection agreement by route: Distribution + WMPA ~180 days, Transmission (TC1) 668 days, legacy transmission queue 5+ years.
Source: PJM, Modo Energy · distribution timeline illustrative

The reward for skipping the queue could be significant. Modelled over the past year, a four-hour distributed battery in Dominion - the PJM zone that covers most of Virginia, and home to the densest cluster of data centres in the country - could have earned $449/kW-year from the wholesale market.

Revenue waterfall for a 4-hour distributed battery in Dominion: Energy $113 + Regulation $212 + Reserves $37 + Capacity $87 = $449/kW-year.
Source: Modo Energy vBESS benchmark, Dominion zone

But nearly half of that revenue comes from Regulation - a market PJM sizes at just 750 MW. There's already 596 MW of batteries operating, with another 1,900 MW on the way. As that supply lands, the Regulation price will fall - and the fattest part of the stack will start to erode.

PJM Regulation requirement of 750 MW versus operating battery capacity (596 MW) and operating plus Transition Cycle 1 (2,496 MW).
Source: PJM, Modo Energy

So the distributed route is a genuine opening - but it's an early mover's game. Wait, and you're buying into a thinner market.

Read the full analysis
Distributed BESS in PJM: Skip the queue with a WMPA
William Rawlings · 8 min read  →
Ask Ko
Dive deeper into PJM with Ko, Modo Energy's AI assistant:
What's the long-term revenue outlook for batteries in PJM? → Which regions within PJM provide the most attractive BESS returns over time? →
SPP
21 GW of BESS by 2032?

From where I'm sitting, SPP might be the most exciting market in the country for prospective battery owners and developers right now.

 
●  Live webinar  ·  Aug 6, 2026 · 2:00 PM ET
Battery Energy Storage in the US: The Forward Outlook
Where build-out, revenues, and prices are heading - across all seven major ISOs and RTOs.
Quentin Scrimshire Brandt Vermillion Quentin Scrimshire, CEO
Brandt Vermillion, US Market Lead
Register free →

The fundamentals line up in a way few other markets manage, and it has one of the quickest, lowest-attrition routes to interconnection in the US.

It's no surprise SPP just posted its biggest quarter of battery additions on record - eight new batteries, totalling 820 MW of new capacity.

Read the full analysis
SPP BESS Buildout 2026 Q2: fleet streamlines to 1.4 GW
Ovais Kashif · 7 min read  →

The near-term pipeline is just as busy. 1.3 GW of capacity with signed interconnection agreements is due online by the start of 2027, led by the 594 MW GREC project in Oklahoma.

Cumulative IA-executed SPP battery capacity by quarter, rising from 1,643 MW to 2,938 MW as 1.3 GW of new capacity comes online through Q1 2027.
Source: SPP, Modo Energy

Behind it, the queue is moving. SPP's Consolidated Planning Process reform unblocked more than 5 GW of new interconnection agreements last quarter alone.

The trajectory is remarkable. Modo Energy's forecast has SPP battery capacity climbing to 21 GW by 2032 - built from the projects already in the queue, plus the extra capacity our model expects to be economically viable.

SPP battery buildout projection by interconnection stage reaching 21 GW by 2032, with a grey projected-attrition band and Modo's forecast line.
Source: SPP, Modo Energy
Ask Ko
Dive deeper into SPP with Ko, Modo Energy's AI assistant:
What's the revenue outlook for batteries in SPP out to 2040? → Is SPP the best US market to build a battery right now? →
ISO-NE
14.5 GW queued, 4.4 GW built

New England runs on state contracts. A project in ISO-NE's queue tends to get built only if a state is already paying for it.

The active queue holds 14,541 MW of generation (wind, solar, gas) and storage, but Modo Energy projects only 4,395 MW will actually be online by 2029. Everything without an executed interconnection agreement drops out, along with the projects aiming for 2031 or later, and a further chunk once you apply the rates at which projects historically get built.

ISO-NE interconnection funnel: 14,541 MW active queue narrows to 8,352 MW IA-executed, 5,952 MW committed through 2029, and 4,395 MW expected build.
Source: ISO-NE, Modo Energy

Offshore wind makes it through because every offshore project in the queue is sitting on a state contract. Merchant gas, with nothing to sell into, feels less feasible.

Batteries are the biggest technology in the queue, but where they'll end up getting built is heavily skewed. More than three-quarters of battery capacity expected to build is in Massachusetts.

Treemap of expected ISO-NE battery capacity by zone: Boston/NE MA 989 MW, SE MA 337 MW, W/C MA 34 MW, Connecticut 272 MW, Rhode Island 161 MW. Massachusetts zones make up 76%.
Source: ISO-NE, Modo Energy

That's because Massachusetts pays batteries a Clean Peak premium for charging on renewables and discharging at peak, on top of their energy-market income, and it's contracting 5,000 MW of storage by 2030.

Read the full analysis
ISO-NE's queue shows below 5 GW of buildout through 2029
Tia Pappas · 7 min read  →
Ask Ko
Dive deeper into ISO-NE with Ko, Modo Energy's AI assistant:
What's the revenue outlook for batteries in ISO-NE out to 2040? → How do future battery revenues in ISO-NE compare with NYISO? →
And that's everything from me this week. Feel free to reply to this email and let me know what you want to see more of - I read every response.
- Neil
US Power Markets, Modo Energy · LinkedIn
A free Modo Energy account unlocks 3 subscriber-only articles a month.
Including everything linked above. No credit card, no demo call.
Create a free account →
Enjoyed this? Forward it to a colleague.
Got this forwarded? Sign up free →
Modo Energy · Weekly Dispatch, US edition

Modo Energy, 88 Pine St, New York, NY 10005, United States

Unsubscribe Manage preferences